gayagenda Speaks OUT on Blog Talk Radio
November 11, 2009 by James Hipps · Leave a Comment
Tonight, and every Wednesday night at 8 pm EST, your host James Hipps, brings you another episode of the Gay Agenda on Blog Talk Radio.
Click here to listen to the show live and feel free to join us in the chat room or call in to let your voice be heard @ 646-929-0506.
Tonight’s topics included Veteran’s Day, the Mormon church, National Organization for Marriage, and much, much more.
What’s your agenda? Let us know on gayagenda.com’s Blog Talk Radio show!
Missed the show? No worries, you can listen to it on the player below…but make sure you join in next week with special guest Tahlib Britton of FreedomtoMarry.org and author of Indiana Chronicles!
Lessons from the Netherlands on Marriage
November 10, 2009 by James Hipps · 1 Comment
There’s a great interview on the NY Times with M. V. Lee Badgett, the director of the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation Law & Public Policy at the UCLA School of Law and a professor of Economics at the University of Massachusetts in Amherst. Badgett is also the author of “When Gay People Get Married: What Happens When Societies Legalize Same-Sex Marriage,”
The interview was conducted by Lisa Belkin, who also wrote a great piece on the effect of gay marriage on children (click here).
In the Netherlands, same sex marriage has been legal for over a decade, and they had civil unions prior, which is why Badgett chose to study relationships, and the effects of marriage equality there.
The findings, probably not so surprising to most of us who don’t oppose equality, are of significant importance as it demonstrates the importance of equality and inclusion for the LGBT community, as well as demonstrates how the myths of churches being sued for not performing gay marriages are…well, myths. It also shows how society generally acclimates to having a minority, previously discriminated against, included as equals, I would say much like how white society has given full acceptance and includes, in many regions, people of color, after the federal mandates of the Civil Rights movement took effect.
I think it clearly demonstrates what we, as a people have seen happen historically when “a minority” is discriminated against, then included as equals in society. Some opposition will remain, but a relatively small amount, and most importantly, those discriminated against, finally feel part of the society that originally rejected them.
I strongly encourage you to click the link above and read the entire interview, but there’s one question and answer I want to specifically point out. The reason, perhaps obvious I am pointing this out, is the claim by a large percentage of those in opposition to same-sex marriage that if allowed, it will somehow subtract from their marriage:
Q. What is the “take away” for those who are debating these questions in the U.S.?
A. The big point is that all of the evidence suggests that same-sex couples will fit right into our current understanding of marriage in the U.S. Marriage itself will not be affected. Dutch heterosexuals appear to have adapted to the legal change by changing how they see same-sex couples, not how they see marriage. Now they see gay couples as people who should get married, and they are happy to remind their gay and lesbian family members of that fact!
I remember when President Obama was elected, Whoopie Goldberg made a comment that has stuck prevalently in my mind. She said something to the affect of, “I know I’m an American, and I’ve always felt like an American. But now, I feel like I can put my bags down.”
I am a proud American. I love my country, even though, those like Maggie Gallagher boastfully tout a majority of Americans don’t accept me, or any other LGBT person. I love a country that rejects me. I love a country that keeps me as a second-class citizen. I love a country that demands my tax dollars, yet allows tax-exempt organizations to fight against my equality. I love a country where I was born, yet because of who I love, refuses to give me the same rights that a majority of it’s citizens take for granted. I too am an American…and proud to be part of this great nation, yet because of the anti-gay movement, based on religious ideology and not fact, I too am waiting to put my bags down.
Portugal Ready to Leagalize Gay Marriage
November 9, 2009 by James Hipps · 2 Comments
According to sources, José Sócrates, the Prime Minister of Portugal, has been busy developing a new government after the elections in September. Part of that new government is equality for the country’s LGBT citizens. On October 23, Sócrates stated that legalizing same-sex marriage will be one of the new leadership’s first changes.
According to a post on PortugalGay.pt:
“The measure is part of the official program of the party and according to government sources, the move will be done as soon as the government is complete.” (Complete as in completely formed).
Portuguese lawmakers from all parties are in favor of the move and support marriage equality, leading to the belief the bill will pass with ease.
Portugal has recognizes “de facto unions” for both opposite and same-sex couples since 2001, but much like civil unions, they only grant limited rights to couples, so the lawmakers feel it’s time to even the playing field.
Portugal would become the nineth country to legalize same-sex marriage, joining the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, Norway, Sweden and Nepal in offering its LGBT citizens marriage equality.
Netherlands Antilles Fight Against Gay Rights
July 22, 2008 by James Hipps · Leave a Comment
The government of the Netherlands Antilles announced it will fight against a recent court ruling supporting a lesbian couples right to health insurance. The Netherlands Antilles and Aruba, both former Dutch colonies, have autonomous status within the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
On Monday, July 21, the court, located in the capital of Willemstad ruled same-sex couples have the same rights in the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba as in the Netherlands. Antillean Health Minister Omayra Leeflang said the appeal was a matter of principle.
Leeflang contested that Dutch perceptions about marriage should not be allowed to overturn Antillean civil law, which currently does not recognize gay marriage. She also wanted to know to what extent the countries in the Netherlands were allowed to make their own decisions on such matters.
Leeflang fears that the Antilles may also have to follow Dutch law regarding abortion and euthanasia.


